Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2009

Sun’s Colorado Consolidation Saves Millions describes how Sun used Liebert’s XD rack cooling, clear vinyl cold isle curtains and flywheels to increase the density of its data center while also reducing energy consumption.  They reduced 165,000 square feet of data center space into 700 square feet while reducing their monthly power usage by one million kilowatt-hours.

When we considered the XD cooling units, there were two options: chilled water or refrigerant.  In the case of chilled water, there was the question of potential water leaks in these rack-attached units.  With the refrigerant option, there was the question of an increase in the number of condensers and where they would be placed and how much  more maintenance would be needed.  With either option, there is also an increase in the need for maintenance inside the server room amongst the servers, storage, switches, etc.  The obvious benefit of the XD units is the fact that they can provide enough cooling for up to 30 kW in a single rack.  Although, if I recall correctly, there is a limit to the total number of racks with the refrigerant-based version due to limits on the maximum pressure or capacity of the refrigerant in a single system.

As for the vinyl curtains, there is usually more of an objection to their aesthetics.  Personally, I would like to see them installed to help keep the cold air completely contained in the cold aisle, where it is intended.  Especially in raised floor environments with high velocity air flow where the cold air might be pushed outside the confines of the cold aisle without such containment.

One question about Sun’s use of the flywheel: How large are your flywheels?  Flywheels generally supply on the order of ten seconds or so of power, which is usually enough time for generators to kick on but cuts it very close.  What type of services run out of Sun’s Colorado facility?

Read Full Post »

Out of necessity, we have some file systems that are 25 TB.  As of 2009, we consider 25 TB a large file system and we are concerned about the potential downtime that may result if an fsck is needed.

Some storage vendors advertise that they can have single file systems that are hundreds of terabytes or even a petabyte.  Often, however, there is no mention of when or if fsck or similar operations would be needed and how long they take.

ZFS claims to eliminate the need for fsck and Chunkfs (ext2 enhancements from around 2006) claims to reduce fsck times by splitting the repair domain.  Further, “journaling file systems only speed fsck time in the case of a system crash, disconnected disk, or other interruptions in the middle of file system updates. They do not speed recovery in the case ‘real’ metadata corruption” (see third paragraph here).

1.) What do you consider a large file system? (What file system do you use for them?)
2.) Are you concerned about fsck times?  (Why or why not?)
3.) Can you predict fsck times based on some parameters (e.g., inodes used, disk size, etc.)?
4.) Any special cases related to fsck or similar operations for clustered file systems?

Read Full Post »

Here’s a notable quote from Not All Apps Are Fit for the Cloud | The Intelligent Enterprise Blog

With cloud computing the trick is not to follow the hype and the crowd, but to understand your own issues and applications first. From there you can make an educated call as to what applications make sense to outsource to a good cloud computing platform, and what applications to keep local. Keep in mind that this should be an evolving process, and you can always relocate applications as the cloud computing resources improve, and clearly they will.

Which applications have you put in the cloud?

Read Full Post »

Redundancy in the Cloud

The article Forecast Mostly Sunny for Company Opting for Cloud Computing describes some of the common cloud computing benefits and potential drawbacks. One of the common drawbacks listed is that you are completely reliant on your cloud computing vendor (in this case Amazon). Near the end of the article, two comments from Stevie Clifton, Animoto’s CTO, match two that I’ve often thought when hearing the drawback about vendor reliance:

  1. It’s no different than using any other web or application hosting as companies have done for some time.
  2. At some point, you could use servers instances across more than one vendor’s cloud to limit your risk of reliance on one vendor.

Do you see using services in the cloud from being any different than utilizing other web/application hosting, server co-location or managed services in terms of reliance on other vendors?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.